W. M. Mendis & Co. directors must settle their outstanding Value Added Tax (VAT) payments as previously ordered, according to the Colombo Magistrate's Court.
Additional Magistrate Oshada Migara Maharachchi issued this directive to the board of directors, rejecting a request from the company for relief regarding the payment schedule.
The order came during a case filed by the Commissioner General of Inland Revenue to recover Rs. 996 million in unpaid taxes for the 2016-2017 period.
Defendant Arjun Aloysius, a director of the company, appeared in court for the proceedings.
Counsel representing the defendant informed the court that the Excise Department suspended the company's liquor production licenses. Furthermore, the defence highlighted that banks are preparing to auction the company’s distilleries, leading to significant financial difficulties in meeting tax instalments.
Given these circumstances, the lawyer requested a revision to the current payment terms.
In response, attorney Dinesh Perera, appearing for the Inland Revenue Department, noted that five separate cases exist against the board members for tax default.
He reminded the court that directors previously received prison sentences in one case for failing to settle arrears.
Consequently, the prosecution urged the court to maintain the existing payment orders.
After considering the facts, the Additional Magistrate ruled that because the deadline for payment had already passed, the company must take immediate steps to pay the taxes as ordered.
The court called for a progress report on the payments by May 25.
Additional Magistrate Oshada Migara Maharachchi issued this directive to the board of directors, rejecting a request from the company for relief regarding the payment schedule.
The order came during a case filed by the Commissioner General of Inland Revenue to recover Rs. 996 million in unpaid taxes for the 2016-2017 period.
Defendant Arjun Aloysius, a director of the company, appeared in court for the proceedings.
Counsel representing the defendant informed the court that the Excise Department suspended the company's liquor production licenses. Furthermore, the defence highlighted that banks are preparing to auction the company’s distilleries, leading to significant financial difficulties in meeting tax instalments.
Given these circumstances, the lawyer requested a revision to the current payment terms.
In response, attorney Dinesh Perera, appearing for the Inland Revenue Department, noted that five separate cases exist against the board members for tax default.
He reminded the court that directors previously received prison sentences in one case for failing to settle arrears.
Consequently, the prosecution urged the court to maintain the existing payment orders.
After considering the facts, the Additional Magistrate ruled that because the deadline for payment had already passed, the company must take immediate steps to pay the taxes as ordered.
The court called for a progress report on the payments by May 25.
Latest News
Treasury's Bessent welcomes Pakistan's reforms, push to return to capital markets
Local
22 July 2026
Egypt approves oil and gas deals including Perenco North Sinai project
Local
22 July 2026
ASEAN’s external partnerships key to regional resilience
Local
22 July 2026
Ghanaian nationals calls ICC to probe xenophobic violence in South Africa
Local
22 July 2026
Germany vows support for Nigeria on security
Local
22 July 2026
Stephen Curry first active player showcased by Hall of Fame
Local
22 July 2026
US politicians pitch aviation, space business at Farnborough Airshow
Local
22 July 2026
Porsche plans another 5,000 job cuts
Local
22 July 2026
Hamilton can head into F1's August break on a Hungary high
Local
22 July 2026
Food and fury keep India's protests alive
Local
22 July 2026