The Court of Appeal has ordered that the writ petition filed by Deputy Secretary General of Parliament, Attorney-at-Law Chaminda Kularatne, seeking a declaration that the decision to suspend him from service was unlawful, be called for confirmation of facts on July 20. The petition has been filed against the Speaker of Parliament and several others.
The case was taken up today (19) before the Court of Appeal bench comprising Acting President of the Court of Appeal Justice Rohantha Abeysuriya and Justice Priyantha Fernando.
Appearing for the petitioner, President’s Counsel Sanjeewa Jayawardena informed court that he was ready to proceed with the confirmation of facts in relation to the petition.
At that stage, President’s Counsel K. Kanag-Iswaran, appearing for the Speaker—named as the first respondent—stated that he would raise preliminary objections regarding the maintainability of the petition.
President’s Counsel Nigel Hatch, appearing for Ministers Bimal Rathnayake and Anil Jayantha, along with Attorney Chamara Nanayakkarawasam representing another respondent, also indicated that they would raise preliminary objections to the case.
After considering the submissions, the Court of Appeal bench fixed the matter for confirmation of facts on July 20.
The petition was filed by Attorney Chaminda Kularatne seeking a writ order declaring that the Speaker’s decision to suspend him without a proper inquiry was unlawful and to have the decision quashed.
The case was taken up today (19) before the Court of Appeal bench comprising Acting President of the Court of Appeal Justice Rohantha Abeysuriya and Justice Priyantha Fernando.
Appearing for the petitioner, President’s Counsel Sanjeewa Jayawardena informed court that he was ready to proceed with the confirmation of facts in relation to the petition.
At that stage, President’s Counsel K. Kanag-Iswaran, appearing for the Speaker—named as the first respondent—stated that he would raise preliminary objections regarding the maintainability of the petition.
President’s Counsel Nigel Hatch, appearing for Ministers Bimal Rathnayake and Anil Jayantha, along with Attorney Chamara Nanayakkarawasam representing another respondent, also indicated that they would raise preliminary objections to the case.
After considering the submissions, the Court of Appeal bench fixed the matter for confirmation of facts on July 20.
The petition was filed by Attorney Chaminda Kularatne seeking a writ order declaring that the Speaker’s decision to suspend him without a proper inquiry was unlawful and to have the decision quashed.
Latest News
Brexit cost 6% of UK economy, Bank of England data suggests
Local
19 June 2026
35 killed in mass shooting at Niger’s biggest airport
Local
19 June 2026
South Korea’s Lee says Trump open to considering phased approach to North Korea nuclear issue
Local
19 June 2026
CSE opens trading floor for an investor forum June 25
Local
19 June 2026
Starmer faces pressure after Burnham’s victory
Local
19 June 2026
No Iran sanctions lifted without France’s consent
Local
19 June 2026
Bank of Japan Governor discharged from hospital
Local
19 June 2026
Over 1 bn barrels of oil have gone missing
Local
19 June 2026
Tehran’s covert units allegedly target Gulf states
Local
19 June 2026
Peking University delegation conducts research on bilateral cooperation in Colombo
Local
19 June 2026