Colombo Fort Magistrate Pasan Amarasena ordered today (05) that the Court of Appeal be informed that statements made to the media by former Members of Parliament Udaya Gammanpila, Wimal Weerawansa, and Asanka Navaratne, Member of Parliament Dilith Jayaweera, Sugeeshwara Bandara, and Mahinda Pathirana were found in contempt of court.
The Magistrate informed in court today (05) that this notification is being made regarding statements made by these six persons through electronic media and social media are in contempt of court, hindering the Easter Sunday terrorist attack investigation being conducted regarding former Chief of National Intelligence Suresh Sallay.
The Magistrate made this notification in relation to facts presented to court by the Criminal Investigation Department regarding this matter.
The Criminal Investigation Department informed court that various statements made by the six persons regarding the Easter attack were being broadcast through electronic media and social media, and that it was an obstacle to this investigation.
The Criminal Investigation Department informed court that these statements were of contempt of court.
The Criminal Investigation Department informed court that issuing statements in this manner under sections 1, 2, and 3 under 3(1)(a) of Act No. 8 of 2024 is a punishable offence, and that false facts were broadcast by these six individuals through electronic media and social media.
Furthermore, permission was also granted by court to the Criminal Investigation Department to obtain unedited footage of relevant statements broadcast regarding this investigation since June 07 from media institutions.
The Magistrate informed in court today (05) that this notification is being made regarding statements made by these six persons through electronic media and social media are in contempt of court, hindering the Easter Sunday terrorist attack investigation being conducted regarding former Chief of National Intelligence Suresh Sallay.
The Magistrate made this notification in relation to facts presented to court by the Criminal Investigation Department regarding this matter.
The Criminal Investigation Department informed court that various statements made by the six persons regarding the Easter attack were being broadcast through electronic media and social media, and that it was an obstacle to this investigation.
The Criminal Investigation Department informed court that these statements were of contempt of court.
The Criminal Investigation Department informed court that issuing statements in this manner under sections 1, 2, and 3 under 3(1)(a) of Act No. 8 of 2024 is a punishable offence, and that false facts were broadcast by these six individuals through electronic media and social media.
Furthermore, permission was also granted by court to the Criminal Investigation Department to obtain unedited footage of relevant statements broadcast regarding this investigation since June 07 from media institutions.
Latest News
Thai PM vows new gun law after deadly school shooting
Local
07 August 2026
Iranian lawmakers draft law to bar "hostile" vessels from Strait of Hormuz
Local
07 August 2026
Iran, Oman routes to remain open temporarily under proposed Hormuz deal, state media says
Local
07 August 2026
A new youth agitation grips an Indian state after 'cockroach' protests
Local
07 August 2026
Cinnamon Box Office launches ‘Destination Event’ calendar
Local
07 August 2026
A spate of Houthi attacks kill and wound dozens in Yemen
Local
07 August 2026
Bill for 22nd Amendment to Constitution gazetted
Local
07 August 2026
Bangladeshi cricket star Shakib says he is ready to return home and face trial if given security
Local
07 August 2026
Japan's food self-sufficiency touches record low level
Local
07 August 2026
Spain plans burials, seeks identities of those killed in Ceuta migrant rush
Local
07 August 2026