Two British teenage boys who were initially spared custodial sentences after being convicted of rape were ordered on Thursday to serve four years' detention by London's Court of Appeal, which ruled that the original sentences were unduly lenient.
The original sentences caused a public and political outcry after three teenage boys avoided custody despite being convicted of raping two girls in separate attacks.
Prime Minister Keir Starmer described the case as appalling, saying before the appeal court ruling that he supported a review of the sentences. His attorney general later referred the case to the Court of Appeal.
The attacks took place in southern England in November 2024 and January 2025.
The two boys whose sentences were increased, referred to in court as X and Y and aged 14 at the time of the offences, were convicted in May of raping both victims and of offences relating to indecent images recorded during the attacks.
Lady Chief Justice Sue Carr, the most senior judge in England and Wales, said the repeated offending by X and Y meant a custodial sentence was "unavoidable."
"What you both did was so bad that we decided we had no other choice but to make these sentences," Carr said in delivering the three-judge panel's ruling.
X and Y will be released after serving half of the custodial term, Carr added, with time already spent in detention and part of the time spent on bail under curfew counting towards their sentences.
The third boy, referred to as Z and aged 13 at the time of the incident, was convicted in May of two counts of rape by encouraging one of the attacks and an offence of indecent images. He was sentenced to an 18-month youth rehabilitation order.
-Reuters
The original sentences caused a public and political outcry after three teenage boys avoided custody despite being convicted of raping two girls in separate attacks.
Prime Minister Keir Starmer described the case as appalling, saying before the appeal court ruling that he supported a review of the sentences. His attorney general later referred the case to the Court of Appeal.
The attacks took place in southern England in November 2024 and January 2025.
The two boys whose sentences were increased, referred to in court as X and Y and aged 14 at the time of the offences, were convicted in May of raping both victims and of offences relating to indecent images recorded during the attacks.
Lady Chief Justice Sue Carr, the most senior judge in England and Wales, said the repeated offending by X and Y meant a custodial sentence was "unavoidable."
"What you both did was so bad that we decided we had no other choice but to make these sentences," Carr said in delivering the three-judge panel's ruling.
X and Y will be released after serving half of the custodial term, Carr added, with time already spent in detention and part of the time spent on bail under curfew counting towards their sentences.
The third boy, referred to as Z and aged 13 at the time of the incident, was convicted in May of two counts of rape by encouraging one of the attacks and an offence of indecent images. He was sentenced to an 18-month youth rehabilitation order.
-Reuters
Latest News
Trump biofuel goals hit reality as US plants lag
Local
02 July 2026
Trial for Bundibugyo Ebola treatment starts in DRC
Local
02 July 2026
Premier League clubs interested in Japan's Nakamura
Local
02 July 2026
Firefighters battle blazes in southern France
Local
02 July 2026
Monk from 'Hiru Shasanawatharana' achieves top results
Local
02 July 2026
Canadian court publication ban raises press-freedom concerns
Local
02 July 2026
World Cup boom falters as US hospitality jobs fall
Local
02 July 2026
Russian fuel crisis prompts rush for electric cars
Local
02 July 2026
US Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship
Local
02 July 2026
Two British teenage rapists given 4-year detention
Local
02 July 2026